🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations worked, and shared recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been eliminated. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations resume.

The US president in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He said the strikes started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the European states that had always attempted to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a response in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the wake of this invasion."